The Standard is reporting that the National Government intends changing the definitions in the Resource Management Act so that "amenity value" can no longer be used as an assessment criteria for development:
We have received information that National’s plan to change the definition of ‘environment’ under the RMA in their 100-day legislation roll out will consist of removing the legal protection of a range of important parts of NZ’s environment, such as eco-systems, amenity values (e.g. the look and appearance of a landscape or townscape) and the human factors that affect the environment (e.g. constructing a building within a sensitive landscape, or a factory making too much noise near houses).
The RMA currently defines the environment as:
(a) Ecosystems and their constituent parts, including people and communities; and
(b) All natural and physical resources; and
(c) Amenity values; and
(d) The social, economic, aesthetic, and cultural conditions which affect the matters stated in paragraphs (a) to (c) of this definition or which are affected by those matters
National is set to reduce the definition of environment to only “natural and physical resources”.
The effect of this change on the Basin Reserve would be enormous. The sound of bat on ball - undisturbed by boy racers and truck exhausts - is clearly an amenity value, as is the cultural and historical significance of the Basin. If these enjoyment and heritage values will no longer be considered, then the NZ Transport Agency will have carte blanche to destroy the Basin Reserve for future generations.
We're appalled.
Recent comments
7 weeks 6 days ago
7 weeks 6 days ago
25 weeks 1 day ago
25 weeks 1 day ago
25 weeks 1 day ago
25 weeks 2 days ago
25 weeks 2 days ago
28 weeks 6 days ago
29 weeks 3 days ago
29 weeks 4 days ago